Archive

Archive for the ‘PREDICT’ Category

My Story: Student Engagement in Curriculum Design

For the last year, I Natasha am the Research Assistant on the PREDICT (Promoting Realistic Engaging Discussions in Curriculum Teams) project working at the Learning Development Centre, in City University London. The main purpose of the project is to look at Curriculum Design at City and four other British Universities, including Birmingham, Cardiff, Cambridge and Greenwich universities.  This project is funded by JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee) and aims to develop a new curriculum design process within City that is efficient, flexible and focuses on enhancing educational development and the student experience.   In order to carry this out, it is vital to engage all academics and students in the process.

As part of my research, I have used a qualitative approach, which allowed me to collect broadly defined data to get the best possible feel of the situation and behaviour of student programme representatives.  This consisted of an exploratory survey in order to collect answers to the same set of questions from individual students to gage their opinions and views as well as develop a wider picture on the theme of curriculum design. This approach has informed us as to whether students feel involved and engaged with the planning, development and design of their curriculum.  If they already do, it is important to assess whether they would like further or less involvement/ engagement in this process.

In November 2011 the first STARS conference for Student Programme Representatives took place, I distributed 80 questionnaires on student engagement in curriculum design with an attached slip for their contact details should they wish to take part in future research,   I received twenty one completed questionnaires as well as nineteen contact details slips.

During the year of the project I have conducted interviews with academics who are involved in some way in the design of their programmes or modules.  Three of these academics are taking part in the MAAP (MA in Academic Practice) and are being interviewed pre and post module, to gage whether they have more of an understanding of curriculum design and will now consider other issues regarding the process.  In addition, they will be asked whether more student involvement in the design of their curriculum should be encouraged.

All this data will also inform publications of papers and journals, workshops and conference presentations, as well as future models of good practice that can be shared and used across programmes in City University London and disseminated within the wider higher education community. 

 Natasha

 

Categories: Curriculum Design, PREDICT

Student Engagement Workshop

April 21, 2012 Leave a comment

On the curriculum design and evaluation module Angela Dove and I ran a student engagement workshop. This workshop focused on why students should be engaged in designing curriculum but also how we might do this so it was meaningful. The session used a framework from the Learner Voice a handbook from futurelab published in 2006. The framework uses five types of participation which are:

  • inform
  • consult
  • involve
  • collaborate
  • empower

in the workshop a range of activities were suggested from co-chairing meetings, to using feedback to feed into the next year of the programme and providing optional modules with credit for students to be involved. There was also discussion around some examples of how to engage students in specific activities.

Defining Curriculum

April 21, 2012 1 comment

On the curriculum design and evaluation module on wednesday 18th April 2012 we had a great discussion about definitions of curriculum. Barnett et al (2001) and Fraser (2006) believed there was limited discussion of this term in higher education however this has changed at City University London over the last few years.

The group spent some time discussing what this term meant to them and their students. The discussion included references to:

  • was this about the module/programme content
  • the subjects taught and assessment of this
  • the competencies of the students
  • what the graduate would be at the end
  • a journey for the student
  • developing an individual
  • quality assurance delivery and recieving
  • promoting a change in behaviour linked to a role in society
  • is this about the programme and the university part of a programme only or was this about the entire educational experience

There was much discussion about how we need to define this for our students if we wish them to understand what the term means.

Professor Susannah Quinsee and I have defined this for our purposes for the PREDICT project and this definition is the

“Curriculum relates to all aspects of the student experience during their programme both within the institution and beyond which enable them to engage in their learning and achieve their potential” (Parker & Quinsee 2012:51).

References

Barnett R, Parry G & Coate K (2001) Conceptualising Curriculum Change Teaching in Higher Education Vol. 6 No 4 p435-449

Fraser S P (2006) Shaping the University Curriculum through Partnerships and Critical Conversations International Journal for Academic Development Vol. 11 No.1 p5-17

Parker P & Quinsee S (2012) Facilitating Institutional Change in Higher Education International Journal of learning Vol.18 (5) p.49-59

Curriculum Design and Evaluation Module on the MA Academic Practice

April 21, 2012 Leave a comment

MAAP Puzzle

This module is a masters level in year one of the MA Academic Practice Programme and can be taken as both a module on the programme or as a stand alone module and provides students with 15 credits.

The content of the model focuses on a range of areas that need to be considered both for design and evaluation. These are:

Definitions of curriculum

we discuss those that are published and well known as well as those that participants have and use with their students

Different categories for models and frameworks

We look at a range of models and frameworks that have been used from the traditional product approach where behaviouralism was a focus to more process orientated approaches such as experiential approaches to more recent models of the backward design and domains of learning

Stakeholders that should be involved

We discuss those who should be involved in programmes and how to engage them particularly students

Employability

This focuses on how to ensure what employers look for in terms of abilities are included and the careers team provide this session

Curriculum design process

We explore how the design is undertaken and invite some of those undertaking curriculum design in the University to come and discuss their approach

Curriculum approval

We discuss the process to getting from your idea and a need to gaining approval

Sustainability

This session explores sustainability and what this means for curriculum design

Curriculum evaluation

We discuss the approaches to doing this both throughout the programme and at key points

The module currently runs on two blocks of two days. The last day of the module is used for the assessment which is  a verbal presentation which is appropriate to the activity that has to be undertaken when trying to persuade others about a proposed module or programme. The assessment criteria are designed by the staff on the module and then these are used for self, peer and lecturer assessment.

Categories: Curriculum Design, PREDICT

Communication, Curriculums and Karen.

January 24, 2012 Leave a comment

Case study:

Communication in Curriculum Design .

Karen Rawlings-Anderson. Senior Lecturer. School of Health Sciences.

Karen has recently taken on the role of leading the design of the new curriculum to be delivered across the nursing programs starting in September  2012. This mammoth task has required the coordination of input from a large number of staff from across the school. I spent some time with Karen to find out what she had found helpful in promoting communication and collaboration within this project.

So how did you get started?

Initially I sent out an email looking for people who wanted to be involved in the redesign. The aim of this was to recruit people in who were interested in being part of this. We didn’t have  a formal communication strategy but hoped they would disseminate information from the curriculum development back to their teams/division/field.  I set up a community on My City which the University was promoting at the time. The aim of this was to avoid blocking up people’s in-boxes with attachments. It would be a one-stop shop for all the relevant information needed for the new curriculum.

How have you found using My City?

In all honesty it hasn’t been well utilised. I still get emails asking for the information that has already been put into My City. My City has its problems in organising information and have had to set up a separate archive for old versions of the documents. I am now considering setting up a Moodle space to use as a forum to communicate about the new curriculum and abandon My City altogether. I didn’t consider using Moodle initially because I thought it was just for students. I think that people just don’t access these spaces because they are simply too busy. It is an added task. The single log-in doesn’t automatically take us to these spaces, we have to go and actively look for them. There isn’t the time to do this whilst trying to actively manage the flow of email.

How have you dealt with these challenges?

When designing this curriculum it didn’t feel right to start trying to use new methodologies like document sharing etc, because there was enough stress in just dealing with the work. I didn’t want to add to it for people by adding in new ways of communicating. Just because we have these new technologies it doesn’t mean we have to use them or they will be any more effective. People have their own habits of learning and communicating, and during a curriculum design wasn’t the time for trying something new. At present we are using the central N drive to store documents and using email and face to face meetings. I wouldn’t want to move away from email entirely and rely on people to visit a communication space like Moodle or My City because I would be worried about communication breaking down.

Would you consider using some of the electronic communication methods like Adobe Connect?

I have had some experience of using Connect in virtual tutorials. I did find it quite difficult to use. It’s also disruptive for people sharing offices, especially if we are moving to open plan offices. If people can’t attend meetings in person, I doubt they would want to attend them remotely. We have generally had very good attendance at face-to face meeting so don’t see the need for a virtual option.

Participating in the Second JISC webinar on Curriculum Development

November 23, 2011 2 comments

I’m the City University Learning Development Associate with specific responsibility for curriculum development. City is actively involved in curriculum development with Predict: part of a national JISC project.

Taking part in the second JISC Webinar on Curriculum Design: Nov 2nd 2011, was an opportunity to find out what 31 colleagues are concerned about nationally and internationally. As people joined the session, from Canada, India, and Australia etc. Marianne Shepherd of JISC presented key ideas: beginning with suggesting three levels of desired improvement.

Personal transformation and learning, curriculum transformation and Institutional transformation.

And the key drivers being enhancing the learning experience and improving graduate employability.

Helen Beetham, an e-learning consultant, took us through some project examples of developing “digital literature” for CD, one obvious benefit being wider potential for sharing than paper based information.

I guess I am more used to the N. American way of running a webinar, where at least 50% of the session is about engaging with other colleagues via the chat room/video/audio. So I was slightly frustrated at the balance between content (presentations) and dialogue. A little more time on the latter would have been valuable.

However the session itself was rich in ideas and pointed to some impressive work by colleagues at several institutions. One project that particularly inspired me was the Open University’s OULD Project which includes different tools for visually planning and representing the curriculum. These are not only digital tools, they also have for example sets of stickers and A3 sheets of paper. My definition of a good tool is one that does the job well, and important as the digital is, analogue materials play an essential role in visualising and collaborating.

I believe there is a real possibility of using some of the OU’s frameworks, customised to fit with City’s current priorities, not least at undergraduate level. The JISC Design Studio showcases the OU  and other interesting and valuable curriculum design projects.

PREDICT Project

August 3, 2011 Leave a comment

PREDICT, which stands for ‘Promoting Realistic Engaging Discussions in Curriculum Teams) is a JISC funded project within the Institutional Approaches to Curriculum Design Programme. The project focus is to develop a new curriculum design process that is efficient, flexible, focuses on enhancing educational development and the student experience and, is supported with responsive technology to accommodate our curriculum models. It is essential that the design process takes account of our diverse stakeholders – whether learners, staff or employers.

The Project has been running for three years and we have provided information in a range of ways but would like to use our Blog which has a link to this one. Main sources of information for the PREDICT project are:

PREDICT aims to develop a new curriculum design process that is efficient and flexible and utilizes responsive technology to accommodate our curriculum models and enhance learning opportunities.

The main objectives of the project are to:
  •   Engage all stakeholders in the process
  •   Develop a curriculum design process drawing upon stakeholder experiences
  •   Use technology to support the curriculum design process
  •   Develop values and principles for curriculum design around educational  development and the student experience
  •  Complete the project with an evaluative and critical approach

We are really interested in case studies of curriculum design and review activity so please do visit our blog this year which will develop with information being added and hopefully will become a place for you to share your practice

Project Manager

Dr Pam Parker

%d bloggers like this: